Discussion about this post

User's avatar
D.L. Gardner's avatar

Thanks for clearly stating your stance on this. I wish more people were more tolerant. I make my own covers but I've studied art since I was a child, a good 65 years ago. I've studied with master artists who encourage their students to emulate their styles. I use AI because I want a certain look for my books that I haven't found any book cover artists around do. I would paint them myself except an oil painting doesn't carry that vivid color that digital art has and would fall flat as a cover. If I did hire an artist who can paint impressionistic realism, the style I paint and create with AI, it wold cost me way more than my books would ever bring in, like you say. It's kind of oppressive when you think about it. Artists want top dollar and readers want free. We're kind of in a rock and a hard spot. Anyway, being an artist myself, I'm fussy about what my covers look like. Last cover I hired someone to make for me, I paid him to copy an AI piece that I created.

Expand full comment
Iseult Murphy's avatar

While covers can cost a lot of money, there are lots of good, non genAI covers available for reasonable prices from artists and cover designers. I know the struggle of having very little money only too well. I work hard on producing the best book I possibly can, including getting the best cover I can afford from designers who don’t use genAI.

There are lots of tools that can be used without resorting to genAI.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts